top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Why sub carrier spacing is more for wifi than lte

+1 vote
1,197 views
Why sub carrier spacing is more for wifi than lte
posted Feb 29, 2016 by Shyam Narayan

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

0 votes

I thinks it is because of orthogonal frequency usages in LTE which make sure at any point of time only one sub-carrier can be at peak. Which minimizes the sub-carrier frequency interference.
Let others comment if anyone has some extra information.

answer Feb 29, 2016 by Salil Agrawal
In LTE , cellular signal coverage is more, so more delay spread-> More ISI-> More freq selective fading due to less coherence BW. Coherence BW is inversely proportional to delay spread.  
To make channel freq flat channel, sub-carrier BW must be less than coherence BW

In wifi , delay spread is less due to less area coverage
commented Mar 16, 2018 by anonymous
Similar Questions
+1 vote
LTE: Why sub-carrier spacing is kept 15 Khz in LTE ?

I know 15 Khz spacing is used between between two sub carrier. From where this 15 Khz is derived ?
What things are considered to calculate this number ?

+1 vote
LTE: Which technology is the best among today's available options for LTE and Wifi aggregation ?

As far as I studied, I know following options that can be used for LTE and Wifi interworking:
1- LTE - U (LTE Unlicensed)
2. LAA (Licensed Assisted Access)
3. LWA (LTE wifi aggregation)
4. MPTCP (Multi path TCP)

Out of above options, there might be other options which I don't know. But out of above four which one is best and due to what reason operator will choose the best one ?

+1 vote
Wi-Fi Direct, connection issue with more than two android devices

Using Wi-Fi direct, I've been able to connect two devices together and pass messages between them. However, when I try to have a third device connect to this group, the WFD connection between the first and second devices either drops, or the third device seems to be ignored.
I haven't been able to find anything specific about one-to-many connections in the documentation. Do they need to be handled in a special way?

...