top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

What is the difference between 'Update Manager' and terminal 'sudo apt-get update' in Linux?

+2 votes
483 views

When I install any Software or tool in Linux by terminal it says you need to update using

sudo apt-get update

Then I get a list of upgrades available in my Linux.

What is the difference between 'Update Manager' and terminal 'sudo apt-get update'?

posted Apr 27, 2016 by anonymous

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

+1 vote

Most of the time, yes, the update manager is equal to apt-get update && apt-get upgrade.However, apt-get upgrade will not install packages like kernel upgrades that are optional but highly recommended, while Update Manager will. You have to use apt-get dist-upgrade for that, in which case you would have a true equivalent.

answer Apr 27, 2016 by Shivam Kumar Pandey
Similar Questions
0 votes
What happen when "sudo apt-get update' is executed ?

What is the relation of "apt-get install" with "apt-get update" ? What exactly "sudo apt-get update" does ?

+1 vote
What is the difference between sudo su and su?

As far as i know,

sudo su command will give root login but it will ask for user password,

su command will give root login but it is asking different password

What is the difference between this 2?

0 votes
What is the use of apt-add-repository command in Ubuntu linux ?

I want to know when "apt-add-repository" becomes mandatory to run in Ubuntu machine. Usually I used following two commands many times.
$sudo apt-get update
$sudo apt-get install

+3 votes
What is the difference between Bootloader and Boot Manager?

As far as I know boot loader is the one who loads OS from ROM to RAM, then why Boot Loader is different as per OS.
And what is boot manager? Is Boot Manager is different as per OS?

+3 votes
In linux, process running in background will be killed if we close the terminal?

Please understand the scenario :

I have an embedded system, on which i do telnet and then i starts i run an application using ./binary_name &.
Now if i close the terminal, and if i do telnet from new terminal then i can see above process is still running.

Now, To check this, i have written a sample program,

#include<stdio.h>
main()
{
    while(1);
}

I just compiled it and i ran it on my linux PC using ./a.out &.
Then i just closed the terminal and from new terminal i checked using ps -elf command this process was killed.

My question is why different behavior for both process. i started both the process in background. Then why?

Any suggestion?

Thanks in advance

...