top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Is the virtuliazation considered as replacement of High availability ?

+1 vote
340 views
Is the virtuliazation considered as replacement of High availability ?
posted Jul 29, 2016 by Harshita

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

0 votes

No, Virtualization Concept is independent from high availability concept. Virtualization gives flexibility to scale up or scale down software instances on dynamic basis. While HA provides 99.99999 percent service availability.
I would like explain the same thing by examples:
Assume you are running MME for a LTE network. Since each node in the system has its software limitation and once the running software reaches to that limitation, it would not be able to provide its services to new user. This problem can be resolved by using the virtualization. If a software is running in virtualized environment, another MME instance will be instantiated once first instance of MME reaches its limitation. However, high availability is completely different. High availability mean if binary crashes services should not be interrupted. These cases are solved by running two instances of MMEs. One instance as active and other one as standby. Whatever context active MME creates, similar context will be created at standby instance.
If active MME crashes, standby MME takes over the role of active and from user point of view, nothing is changed.

answer Jul 30, 2016 by Ganesh
Similar Questions
+1 vote

If a system supports less than 5 nines for the high availability then how it is different from the system which supports high availability up to five nines.

+2 votes

Operators look for OSS on cloud.
How can I move my solution to cloud and how do I choose a cloud platform?

...