top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

5G: Is it necessary to implement different radio interfaces each for different n/w slice supported in NG-RAN node ?

+2 votes
253 views
5G: Is it necessary to implement different radio interfaces each for different n/w slice supported in NG-RAN node ?
posted Mar 28, 2018 by Vikram Singh

Looking for an answer?  Promote on:
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

Similar Questions
0 votes
5G: Is it necessary to support LTE interfaces at next generation core network (NGCN) ?

I was going through deployment options 4A and 7, in which LTE eNodeB interacts with NGCN for control plane and user plane.
I am thinking the scenarios that when an operator would require particular option 7 in which eNodeB control and user plane both ends interface towards NGCN ? If this is the case then S1-AP and NG-AP both protocols will have to implement at next generation core network.
Is my understanding of option 7 is correct ?

+1 vote
5G: Compare to LTE interfaces, why 5G network interface name start with N* ?

In LTE network, there is no pattern for interface name such as X2, S1-AP, S11, S5/S8, Gx etc. But for the 5G network, it starts alphabet Nx where x denotes 1, 2, 3 as numeric. I could not get the logic behind this doing so. It may be some specific reason for that.
If anyone knows about the reason, please share. Thanks in advance.

+2 votes
LTE: Is it necessary, all PGWs serving an UE for different APNs communicate with same PCRF ?

A UE can make simultaneous connections with different PGWs with the assumption that each PGW serving different APN.
In this particular case, is it necessary all different PGWs would be communicating with same PCRF ?

...