top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

How these Capabilities Update Procedure Works ?

+2 votes
403 views

I had a look on this Q/A and got one thing in my mind. How this Procedure works ? because i have read the both RFC but did not find this Procedure and there working.

Reference: http://tech.queryhome.com/41739/why-do-we-require-capabilities-update-procedure-diameter

posted Apr 28, 2014 by Aman

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

+4 votes
  • It is a procedure to dynamically update capabilities of an Application (Client/Server). Application that is wanted to use this feature MUST advertise Application-Id 10 in CER/CEA (Capabilities-Exchange-Request/Answer)message. Both communicating nodes MUST support Application-Id 10.

  • An application that is going to send Capabilities-Update-Request (CUR) shall send all the Application-Ids currently supported by it (rather than sending only upgraded) on established connection. This message can not modify the security constraint applied on established connection.

  • Receiver of CUR MUST look for intersection of supported Application-Ids received with its own Application-Ids, If there are some common applications then it shall send CUA with Result-Code set to DIAMETER_SUCCESS and shall store the values of Application-Ids else it send Result-Code set to DIAMETER_NO_COMMON_APPLICATION and should terminate transport connection, if there are some on going sessions then it may delay the termination process till completion of sessions.

Capabilities-Update-Request/Answer command code id 328 and Message Format is as follow:

   <CUR> ::= < Diameter Header: 328, REQ >
            { Origin-Host }
            { Origin-Realm }
         1* { Host-IP-Address }
            { Vendor-Id }
            { Product-Name }
            [ Origin-State-Id ]
          * [ Supported-Vendor-Id ]
          * [ Auth-Application-Id ]
          * [ Acct-Application-Id ]
          * [ Vendor-Specific-Application-Id ]
            [ Firmware-Revision ]
          * [ AVP ]
   <CUA> ::= < Diameter Header: 328 >
                           { Origin-Host }
                           { Origin-Realm }
                           { Result-Code }
                           [ Error-Message ]
                         * [ AVP ]

During the processing of CUR/CUA message Vendor-Id AVP in the Vendor-Specific- Application-Id MUST NOT be used in decision making. A Node (Peer) can not use CUR/CUA message to notify the change in its own identity i.e. Origin-Host

Like CER/CEA message; CUR/CUA message can not be relayed, proxied and redirected.

answer Apr 29, 2014 by Hiteshwar Thakur
Similar Questions
+2 votes

What is the sense of giving Capabilities Update Procedure described in new RFC-6737.

+2 votes

In what all scenarios, this procedure gets executed ? And why this procedure need to be executed ?

+2 votes

We are connecting the PCEF to PCRF. But the Gx link is not coming up. I have observed that there are CER/CEA successful between PCEF a PCRF. DWR is generated by PCRF (i.e. seen in the logs) but it is not sent (i.e. not seen in the capture). Any suggestion on what could be the issue.

...