top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Is there any possiblity that ENBs is not having X2 Intercace within same MME?

+1 vote
680 views
Is there any possiblity that ENBs is not having X2 Intercace within same MME?
posted May 13, 2014 by Suresh Kumar

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button
I don't think it will make much sense that x2 interface is missing. Can you elaborate more on your question so that complete picture of the query is clear.
commented May 13, 2014 by Salil Agrawal

1 Answer

+1 vote
 
Best answer

X2 is an optional interface. Is it up to operator to enable/disable this interface. Due to X2 interface, Handover for an UE can be done faster than the S1-based .

eNodeBs can also share information to each other using the X2 interface.
For more details, please go through 3GPP 36.423.
If you still have any doubt or query, please ask .

answer May 13, 2014 by Vimal Kumar Mishra
Similar Questions
+3 votes
Establishing X2-Connection Between two ENBs where operator for them are different is possible or not ???

Consider Two ENB of two different operator can they establish X2-AP Connection if X2-AP Support is there ???

I guess it is possible as ECGI will give unique identification to them . (Though possibility of CGI is same) ...

is there any other scenario like x2AP- is not possible between them

+1 vote
Would there be an advantage of X2 based handover over S1 based handover, when X2 physically spans the same path as S1?

In case of hub-and-spoke topology, X2 messaging can travel all the way back to an aggregation point, which may be co-located with EPC. In such scenario both X2 and S1 traverses same physical path (a.k.a X2 over S1). Please consider both Intra-MME and Inter-MME handover scenarios. Would X2 based handover in such a case yield advantage over S1 based handover. Thanks.

...