top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Adding randomized value to CCA Validity-Time in order to reduce reporting storm to PCEF

0 votes
352 views

Are there any benefits from adding a randomized value to CCA Validity-Time in order to reduce reporting storm to PCEF for voice calls. I think there is for non - duration grants - i.e data since number of data sessions are larger than voice calls.

posted Dec 26, 2017 by Prakash Subramanian

Looking for an answer?  Promote on:
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

Similar Questions
+2 votes
What is the default behavior of the GGSN if no Validity Time AVP is sent from the OCS?

Does the GGSN have an internal validity time configuration to terminate a gprs session?

+1 vote
Diameter AVP Query about the validity time?

The validity time is defined by IETF in Credit-control answer, but the same AVP is not used in 3GPP specification, but for my use case, can use it as IETF defined or make it customized AVP?

+1 vote
Subscription-Id in diameter CCA

Hi,

I am facing a problem wherein I am sending Susbcription-Id AVP (with Data and Type child AVPs) in the CCA where Result-Code is set to 4011 ( DIAMETER_CREDIT_CONTROL_NOT_APPLICABLE) but diameter client is not able to decode the CCA message. Getting following error:

2017-06-21.19:23:00.144|E|message error (body content)
2017-06-21.19:23:00.144|E|Unrecognized message received
2017-06-21.19:23:00.144|A|*** Unrecognized message received ***

But if I return any other AVP other than Susbcription-Id then no such issue.

Kindly help.

...