top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Actual Cause of Election state In DIAMETER protocol ?

+5 votes
444 views

What is the actual Cause of Election state In DIAMETER protocol and what would be the Diameter Behavior after that ?

posted Feb 17, 2014 by Hiteshwar Thakur

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

+1 vote

Not sure if I understand the question correctly, but AFAIK, two peers perform elections (both independently), if they end up initiating CER at the same time. This is so that only one side will respond with CEA, and the other transport connection is closed.

Procedure for election (based on the node names - bigger name in collating sequence wins.) and the steps following the win/loss are also defined so that there is no confusion.

answer Mar 3, 2014 by Rathnakumar Kayyar
Similar Questions
+3 votes
Origin State AVP in Diameter Protocol

I have a query regarding usage of Origin-State-Id AVP in Diameter. The Diameter Base Protocol RFC 3588 says that Origin-State-Id AVP MAY be included in any diameter message.

Now, some diameter based application (like a 3GPP defined application) defines new commands and in those commands’ ABNF Origin-State-Id AVP is not present.

Then does this imply that Origin-State-Id AVP MUST not be sent in these commands or it can be sent because RFC 3588 says it can be sent in any diameter message?

+5 votes
State the difference between Diameter Credit Control Applications and Ro applications

State the difference between Diameter Credit Control Applications and Ro applications with reference to Diameter protocol?

...