top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Documenting builtin methods using python

0 votes
280 views

I have this innocent and simple code:

from collections import deque
exhaust_iter = deque(maxlen=0).extend
exhaust_iter.__doc__ = "Exhaust an iterator efficiently without caching any of its yielded values."

Obviously it does not work. Is there a way to get it to work simply and without creating a new scope (which would be a rather inefficient a way to set documentation, and would hamper introspection)?

How about dropping the "simply" requirement?

posted Jul 11, 2013 by anonymous

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

2 Answers

+1 vote

I think the canonical way to specialize a class (even if it's only docstrings or method re-names) is to extend it with a new class.

answer Jul 11, 2013 by anonymous
+1 vote

I would just go with the most obvious approach:

 def exhaust_iter(iter):
 """
 Exhaust an iterator efficiently without caching
 any of its yielded values
 """
 deque(maxlen=0).extend(iter)

It's not going to be that inefficient unless you're calling it in a long inner loop.

answer Jul 11, 2013 by anonymous
Similar Questions
0 votes

I've been using the settrace function to write a tracer for my program, which is working great except that it doesn't seem to work for built-in functions, like open('filename.txt'). This doesn't seem to be documented, so I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or that's the expected behavior.

If settrace's behavior in this regard is fixed, is there any way to trace calls to open()? I don't want to use Linux's strace, as it'll run for whole program (not just the part I want) and won't show my python line numbers/file names, etc. The other option I considered was monkey-patching the open function through a wrapper, like:

def wrapped_open(*arg,**kw):
 print 'open called'
 traceback.print_stack()
 f = __builtin__.open(*arg,**kw)
 return f
open = wrapped_open

but that seemed very brittle to me. Could someone suggest a better way of doing this?

0 votes

I am trying to use mitmproxy behind a company proxy that requires a user/password login.

The setup is: Local PC's browser -> mitmproxy (on local PC) -> company proxy -> internet.

Based on this SO thread, this is how you use mitmproxy within a Python program. This example works fine when there's no proxy.

from mitmproxy.options import Options
from mitmproxy.proxy.config import ProxyConfig
from mitmproxy.proxy.server import ProxyServer
from mitmproxy.tools.dump import DumpMaster

class Addon(object):
    def __init__(self):
        pass

    def request(self, flow):
        # examine request here 
        pass

    def response(self, flow):
        # examine response here
        pass


if __name__ == "__main__":

    options = Options(listen_host='0.0.0.0', listen_port=8080, http2=True)
    m = DumpMaster(options, with_termlog=False, with_dumper=False)
    config = ProxyConfig(options)

    m.server = ProxyServer(config)
    m.addons.add(Addon())

    try:
        print('starting mitmproxy')
        m.run()
    except KeyboardInterrupt:
        m.shutdown()

Assuming the company proxy is at IP "1.2.3.4" port 3128 and requires a login USER and PASSWORD, how can I change this script to have mitproxy use that proxy instead of going to the internet directly?

Addition info: I am not using mitmdump with the script-parameter to run this script. The goal is to run this from Python 3.8 with a pip-installed mitmproxy

+1 vote

i want to create a chrome extension. its have complex mathematical queries. so i need to use python as scripting language. help me to implement python script in google chrome addon

...