top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Why we are writing TCP/IP why not only TCP or why not UDP/IP?

+1 vote
337 views

TCP and UDP both are IP(Internet Protocol) right?
then why not UDP/IP????

posted Apr 8, 2015 by anonymous

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

+1 vote

The basic idea is pretty simple: with IP (on its own -- no TCP, UDP, etc.) you're just sending a packet of data. You simply send some data onto the net with a destination address, but that's it. By itself, IP gives:

no assurance that it'll be delivered
no way to find out if it was
nothing to let the destination know to expect a packet
much of anything else

All it does is specify a minimal packet format so you can get some data from one point to another (e.g., routers know the packet format, so they can look at the destination and send the packet on its next hop).

TCP is connection oriented. Establishing a connection means that at the beginning of a TCP conversation, it does a "three way handshake" so (in particular) the destination knows that a connection with the source has been established. It keeps track of that address internally, so it can/will/does expect more packets from it, and be able to send replies to (for example) acknowledge each packet it receives. The source and destination also cooperate to serial number all the packets for the acknowledgment scheme, so each end knows whether packets it sent were received at the other end. This doesn't involve much physically, but logically it involves allocating some memory on both ends. That includes memory for metadata like the next packet serial number to use, as well as payload data for possible re-transmission until the other side acknowledges receipt of that packet.

answer Apr 9, 2015 by Vrije Mani Upadhyay
...