top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

LTE: What is the difference between PCC Rule and Packet Filter ?

+2 votes
1,213 views

Depending on the packet filter, it is decided to which bearer does the incoming packet belongs to. If TFT does this job, then what is the use of Pcc-Rule ?

Is it that Pcc-Rules are not matched in case of dedicated bearers as in dedicated bearer packet filter are already matched ?
Is it that DPI is done only for default bearer packets and decided to which pcc-rule is belongs to ?

Please help with reference to spec...

posted Jul 27, 2015 by anonymous

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button
On behalf of Venumadhav Josyula
In LTE UL ue/mobile terminal does tc (traffic classification). On p-gw,e DL side there is pcrf and pecf there is gx interface which uses pcc-rules. So the job of Tft and PC rules is different . One is for classification and other is pcrf charging and policy control. Even though they overlap they have different jobs.

1 Answer

+1 vote

Hi,

PCC rule includes Packet-Filter.

When we say PCC rule then it Packet-Filter is just a part of it. How Traffic shaping will happen depends on a lot of parameters.
Like QCI, ARP, and the QoS-Parameters MBR,GBR. Precedence plays a vital role in the packet filter treatment.

Eg : I have 5 filters in a particular session. Based on the precedence PGW will check if the packet matches the filter and then pass it towards SGW.
Also, there can be a possibility that you may have over-lapping filters. Now to which bearer the packet will go will be decided based on the precedence.

Check 29.212 for more information.

Regards,
Peeyush Sharma

answer Jul 27, 2015 by Peeyush Sharma
Agreed with your answer, but where does the DPI come into picture ?
DPI can be used to check the traffic based on the application like Http, IMS SIGNALLING, FTP, P2P traffic.
Like a particular type application can be allowed or blocked. It can also do the flow inspection based on the group of flows.
It can be integral part of PGW also.

Below link can help you in understanding the DPI functionality.
http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1280856

DPI is not a mandatory part of PGW.
One use case can be that you want to allow only IMS Signalling through the default bearer and you do not have any filters applied on same.
This can be achieved through a DPI.

Regards,
Peeyush Sharma
Similar Questions
+12 votes

Why do we require Gate Function ? I mean to say what is the need for this ? How Significant it is in Gx-Interface?

+3 votes

In the CCA message sent by the PCRF to PGW during the Initial Attach, may have "Charging-Rule-Base-Name" Or "Charging-rule-Name". I think "Charging-rule-Name" is sent as part of the Charging-Rule-Install , where the Rule is sent from the PCRF to PGW. "Charging-Rule-Base-Name" is sent as part of the preinstalled rules in the PGW.

Now the question is if the PCRF is getting integrated to thirdparty PGW. In this case how PCRF knows about the names installed in the PGW ?

thanks a lot for the responses and hints

+3 votes

If PCRF sends Charging-Rule-Base AVP for activation/deactivation of all rules inside the given rulebase in CCA , then is it possible that PCEF was able to activate/deactivate some rules in the rulebase and other rules activation/deactivation failed ?

...